So, my friend Kitling (not her real name) mentioned that she ate fish and fowl, but not pork or beef. And she said "There needs to be a word for 'eats fish and fowl but not beef or pork'".
Well, for people who eat fish but no other meat, there's pescetarian, which is catching on a little bit, finally, and is a damn sight better than "pesco-vegetarian." Lacto-ovo-vegetarian is the term for people who eat eggs and dairy on a vegetarian diet, so the terms for people who eat fish and/or chicken but no other meat (or any of the various other rationalizations people use to call themselves vegetarians even while they still eat meat) tend to follow suit.
I'm aware of those terms. And always a bit annoyed at the folks who keep trying to call themselves vegetarians when they're not.
Part of me thinks there should be a term for people like Flew described (and I think "nonmammaltarian" is at least really funny), on the other hand, part of me just thinks "Isn't "no pork or red meat" good enough?"
I know. I have a friend who says to people, "I don't eat beef," and people actually ask her if she's a vegetarian. She's always, "No. Didn't say I don't eat meat. Said I don't eat beef."
no subject
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x7e0qd_the-new-office-girl_animals
:-D
no subject
*9 down became much more obvious when I realized** it was geneTic material, not geneRic material.
**Somewhere around reread number 11.
no subject
no subject
A newish food blog done by IT geeks and their ilk (including a good friend of mine from Michigan):
http://www.nomnomicon.com/
no subject
(*duck run hide*)
Remember the t-shirt: I am not a vegetarian because I love animals. I am a vegetarian because I hate plants.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Part of me thinks there should be a term for people like Flew described (and I think "nonmammaltarian" is at least really funny), on the other hand, part of me just thinks "Isn't "no pork or red meat" good enough?"
no subject
no subject
no subject